Good morning!š
Hereās hoping everyone had a good weekend. As a Knicks and Rangers fan, this weekend has been pretty epic.
I also became increasingly annoyed with the word āleverageā. Until Aaron Rodgers arrives in New York, which could happen at some point this week, weāre going to continue to hear people debate who has the leverage in this deal.
Weāre going to take a quick look at why I believe the Jets have 75% of the leverage, and thatās me being generous to the Packers who have largely backed themselves into a corner with their comments on moving on.
šØ The Jets continue to be in on Odell Beckham Jr along with the Chiefs, Bills, Patriots, and Ravens. The Cowboys seemed to rule themselves out by trading for Brandin Cooks at the weekend. OBJ has indicated that he received an offer of $4 million which he felt was not good enough, which Iād agree with. He also seemed to dispute a report that he was looking for $20 million. In the end, I think heāll end up getting between $9-$11 million per year on a two-year deal.
š The Jets brought back former punter Thomas Morestead over the weekend. Morestead. was with the jets for 7 games in 2021 following a Braden Mann injury and out-punted the former Texas A&M man. The Jets decided to cut Morestead when Mann returned based purely on potential and age, but Mann has continued his inconsistency and now has competition for his place, something the Jets should have brought in last off-season. There are a few rumblings that the Jets are open to trading Mann, but Iām not sure JD will get any bites.
š¦ Former Eaglesā safety C.J. Gardner-Johnson and the Detroit Lions reached an agreement on a one-year deal worth up to $8 million yesterday. According to Jeff Lane who covers the Eagles, Gardner-Johnson turned down a multi-year extension offer by the Eagles earlier in the off-season after misjudging the market. Itās unclear if the Jets touched base with him, but thatās a nice deal for the Lions.
šŖ The Jets remain firmly interested in bringing in Ben Jones who was released by the Titans earlier this off-season. The Jets currently have a hole at starting center and there are two names likely to fill that in free agency, Ben Jones or former starter Connor McGovern who is still a free agent. Jones has a history with both Todd Downing and Keith Carter, which seems to put the Jets in a good position here.
šÆ The Jets are also intending to improve the defensive line through free agency according to those Iāve spoken with over the weekend, and thatās hardly surprising considering the depth issues we have there. We did re-sign Solomon Thomas and we offered Fletcher Cox a very competitive offer, so donāt be surprised if we see a defensive line signing or two this week. There are still plenty of options out there including Shelby Harris, Poona Ford, Quinton Jefferson, and A'Shawn Robinson.
Joe Banner who was an NFL executive for the Eagles for 17 years perhaps put it best when he was asked about the leverage situation in the Aaron Rodgers deal:
āThe Packers, by waiting, risk that, for some reason, the Jets would not be interested, and then they have no one [to trade with], which really ruins their team for two, probably three years. Believing the Jets will do something that will reflect impatience is not leverage. That's just hoping they're stupid. Leverage is putting the Packers in a position where they could lose the only interested team, which creates a complete disaster for them.ā
Now compare that with what someone like Stephen A. Smith who suggested on ESPN that not only should the Packers be asking for multiple first-round picks, but the Jets shouldnāt hesitate in sending them:
āLet me be very, very clear. If you had to give up two first-round picks to get Aaron Rodgers, I think you should do it if youāre the New York Jets. I will remind everybody, this is not just about the greatness of Aaron Rodgers, Okay? Alright. Itās not just about that. Itās about the perpetual futility of the New York Jets. They havenāt won a Super Bowl since 1968. They havenāt been to a Super Bowl since 1968.ā
There are hundreds of opinions like the ones above, some crazier than others. But I chose these two as I think it perfectly represents the situation. Talking heads and sports pundits are the ones banging the drum for the Jets to pay for historical performance and send multiple picks.
The Jets aren't paying for everything that Aaron Rodgers has achieved over his illustrious career. They are paying for what he will potentially bring to the Jets, and one caveat here is that nobody knows how long he'll continue to play. There is a very real scenario where the Jets are looking for a QB again in 12 months.
NFL executives however are actually looking at the situation as it stands.
Whether we like it or not, there really isnāt a deadline around the corner where this needs to happen. The first pressure point for this deal is really a deadline for the Packers. April 27th is the first day of the draft, and any logical general manager would want to have the deal done by that point to use any picks gained to improve the current roster around new starter Jordan Love.
If the deal isnāt completed before that date then we can all go on a holiday for a month because itās not getting done before June 1st.
The Packers are on the hook for $40.3 million with Rodgers regardless of when they trade him. However, if they trade him before June 1st then they have to carry that $40.3 million on the 2023 cap. If they trade him after June 1st they get to split that cap between two years, carrying $15.8 million this year and $24.5 million next year, which creates significant cap this year.
There are two schools of thought here. Is it better to just take the hit now and then be clear of it next year where you can attack free agency? Or is it better to try and get immediate help now? With the top tier of free agents mostly signed, it would make sense to me to carry the big cap hit this year and start fresh next year.
The truth of the matter is that itās in both teamsā interests to get this done sooner rather than later, and I think it does get done within the next week or two.
The Packers can say theyāre keeping Rodgers, but theyāve already basically said goodbye and Rodgers has already publicly stated he wants to play for the Jets. There is no going back for the Packers now. In a similar vein, I donāt think thereās any going back for the Jets either, theyāre too far down this road.
I think weāll see a deal that looks something like this:
2023 3rd round pick
2024 conditional 4th-round pick that can rise to a first-round pick with a Super Bowl win.
2025 conditional pick that only gets activated if Rodgers plays for the Jets in 2024, maybe a 4th round pick.
If the Packers want guaranteed first-round picks then theyāre not going to get them and the Jets will play a waiting game until the Packers lose any resemblance of leverage. There also is a brand perception element to this. Rodgers has asked the Packers to get this deal done, it doesnāt look great that theyāre dragging their heels and leaving a franchise legend dangling in the wind.
If this was a leverage see-saw then Iād put 75% of the leverage on the Jets' side based on three really important facts that are indisputable at this point:
The Packers want to move on and canāt carry ARās cap in 2023
The Jets are the only team interested in trading for him
Rodgers has publicly said he wants to play for the Jets.
This deal is going to get done, and if I were the Packersā¦Iād want to get it done sooner rather than later.
Any football fan who thinks Stephen A is someone who to quote about any football subject is really clueless about football. Who can forget Stephen Aās great analysis of a Charger Chief playoff game
In the next breath, Smith called the visiting team the "San Diego Chargers," then identified the game's key matchup as the one between Chargers tight end Hunter Henry (who has been out all season with a torn anterior cruciate ligament) and linebacker Derrick Johnson (who played for the Chiefs for 13 seasons, but is now a free agent).
This Packer GM is trying his hardest to save face and probably save his job if Love fails.
I donāt know if the Packer GM has a mentor or a few GM friends that he leans on because Iām sure the open, honest ones would/should have told him, ā you canāt publicly say that you are done with a player and your team is going in a different direction than ask an interested team for two number ones (which has been rumored)ā.
This has been festering since the day Rodgers asked the Packers to draft Tee Higgins and instead drafted Love.
Itās quite possible that the Pack GM was 100% positive that Rodgers was going to retire this year and has really backed himself in a corner.
Good, winning GMs get rid of problems quickly so the fans forget quickly. Keeping problems in the press only intensifies the pressure.
Seeing how Douglas has operated, whatever price he has in his head that is the price, which might become less as draft week approaches.
The question is will Jet fans squawking on social media cause Douglas to change his offer, not a chance but can the same be said out in Green Bay, time will tell.
The crazy thing about the Rodgers trade is the cap impact and cash. National pundits seem to disregard this, as if NFL trades are only about football. It's not - it never is. Is that an unspoken mandate from NFL broadcast rightholders? I
It's compensation for a 1-2 year rental of a legendary QB that was 80% going to retire as of a month ago... Which may destroy your future cap. I still want him, but it's understandable why the Jets are the only team interested
Rodgers contract is crazy. Summary -
If we have him for 1 year only 2023
"the 2024 dead cap hit would be $43.7 million, which is quite steep, obviously.
To soften that hit, if Rodgers officially retired or was cut after June 1, 2024, then his 2024 dead cap number would be $14.575 million, while his 2025 dead cap would be $29.15 million. Still steep, but not franchise-crippling.
If we have him for 2024 and thus get 2 seasons out of him, "Rodgersās 2024 cap hit is $32.5 million, which is quite a reasonable number for a starting quarterback.
However, Rodgers has a $47 million option bonus that becomes guaranteed on the fifth day of the league year."
That last part is cash, not cap. It sounds like Woody has to put cash in escrow (DWH can you confirm this part?), but appears willing.
But if he plays 2 seasons, then retires - $60MM dead cap (!)
If he plays 4 seasons
Cap numbers are
2025: $51.1 million
2026: $45.3 million
Quote is from an article summarizing it from Rivka/Jetsx